![type error in thonny type error in thonny](https://www.simplilearn.com/ice9/free_resources_article_thumb/spyder.png)
This happens when you put the wrong type of data in the wrong place in your code. Indentation errors occur when you make a mistake with the code structure.
#Type error in thonny serial#
I want to use serial communication used at. Syntax errors occur when you type something wrong you could have missed part of a statement or misspelt it. Can I read the value I wrote directly from the computer via modbus without using any transmitter? To start I want to write a simple number using modbus poll, pi pico is connected to my computer via usb. I realized that pi pico does not have wifi so I have to use modbusRTU. I am grateful for your detailed explanation and assistance.
![type error in thonny type error in thonny](https://heardlibrary.github.io/digital-scholarship/script/python/images/thonny-8.png)
Of course, it still won't work when the UART API differs at the board level, when physical, software and virtual UART all have different and distinct API. That shouldn't be a problem, except that trying to do something not supported won't succeed. The only board specific thing is that UART.īoards could present board specific network transport layers if they support it, others would not. It would just work for any board with a UART when running SLIP on the host. If it were not, existed, it could connect to a non-board specific SLIP library, which calls a UART. It doesn't exist for a Pico so cannot be used, nothing which requires it will work.īut I don't believe it should be board specific. It doesn't resolve the fact that some boards simply can't do all the things others can, but it does mean that libraries which would work on multiple boards do, don't need updating and altering to make them work.
![type error in thonny type error in thonny](https://friendly-traceback.github.io/docs/_static/friendly_logo.png)
It means a library that uses, say UART, which could work for all boards doesn't and won't when boards have a differing API for UART.ĬircuitPython seems better in this respect, appearing to have a more top down approach, a common API which boards are required to facilitate when they can. One of the things I dislike about MicroPython is the 'design philosophy' that, except for core functionality, the API is per-board, bottom up, so code for one board might not be usable on something else. Unlike Python, MicroPython can be platform-dependent, as different boards have different capabilities.